Speak Up Now

Blog on Accountability
Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Economy’

Follow up to Soviet Active Measures

September 17, 2010 By: admin Category: Economy, History, International, Politics, Science and Technology, Societal

Just posted the following on the Linkedin.com discussion on Systems Thinking:

1. Haven’t I brought up few weeks ago (in this very thread) the tendency to ever changing “fad” or “crisis” of the day? We’ve got a new one!!!

Yesterday ( http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/16/white-house-global-warming-global-climate-disruption/ )  Quote:
From the administration that brought you “man-caused disaster” and “overseas contingency operation,” another terminology change is in the pipeline.

The White House wants the public to start using the term “global climate disruption” in place of “global warming” — fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.

White House science adviser John Holdren urged people to start using the phrase during a speech last week in Oslo, echoing a plea he made three years earlier. Holdren said global warming is a “dangerous misnomer” for a problem far more complicated than a rise in temperature.  Unquote

2. Thought it might be of interest to see what positions are / were held by the scientific adviser to Barack Obama:

Overpopulation was an early concern and interest. In a 1969 article, Holdren and co-author Paul R. Ehrlich  argued that, “if the population control measures are not initiated immediately, and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come.”[19]  In 1973 Holdren encouraged a decline in fertility to well below replacement in the United States, because “210 million now is too many and 280 million in 2040 is likely to be much too many.”[20] In 1977, Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne H. Ehrlich, and Holdren co-authored the textbook Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment; they discussed the possible role of a wide variety of solutions to overpopulation, from voluntary family planning to enforced population controls, including forced sterilization  for women after they gave birth to a designated number of children, and recommended “the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences” such as access to birth control and abortion.[10][21]

Other early publications include Energy (1971), Human Ecology (1973), Energy in Transition (1980), Earth and the Human Future (1986), Strategic Defenses and the Future of the Arms Race (1987), Building Global Security Through Cooperation (1990), and Conversion of Military R&D (1998).[12]
from : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Holdren

3. In the same Wikipedia summary on J Holden, we find the following references (under Awards):
# Nobel Peace Prize acceptance lecture on behalf of the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, December 1995
# Chair of the Executive Committee of the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, 1987-1997
It should be duly noted that the Pugwash Conference was known for decades as being manipulated, if not outright controlled by the KGB:
http://www.speak-up-now.com/wp-content/uploads/sovietactivemeasures.pdf    paragraph 77, page 17. (See also the mentions of KGB using the environmentalist societies in the same document)

Soviet Active Measures

August 10, 2010 By: admin Category: Business, Economy, History, International, Politics, Societal

SOVIET ACTIVE MEASURES[1]

Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. (George Santayana, The Life of Reason, 1905)

Introduction.

In 10 days, August 20-21, it will be the 42nd anniversary of the Russian occupation of Czechoslovakia. Persons and activities surrounding this event might hold the key to understanding our present, and who knows, maybe the near future. This is my attempt at “connecting-some-dots” and submitting for discussion the question “Where do we think we are heading?”

Every now and then we see someone doing something totally unexpected, “out-of-their –character,” goes the expression. Our typical reaction in such a situation might be, for example, “What in the world is going on?” or “Is he/she gone crazy?” “Why did he/she (Spitzer, Gibson, Lohan …) do that?”

More often than not, we don’t have all the personal, historical, cultural elements that would explain, rationalize, person’s seemingly illogical behavior. Many stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, numerous classic movies and made-for-TV criminal series are based on that premise: – The key to someone’s today’s behavior may be found in distant past and / or a distant land. Unless a person is certifiably psychologically ill, digging deeply enough in his/her past, will always lead to a logical explanation.

The following account is based on the author’s best recollection of the events as they happened some time ago and over several decades. The purpose of this narrative is to help with understanding of recent / current events and maybe assist in forecasting of possible things to come. There will always be people arguing that “history does not repeat itself” since the conditions can never be systemically “identical.” That may be true, in general. However, the Principle of Causality has been sufficiently validated, recognized and is now respected as to help us with acceptance of some degree of predictability based on either some “eerie similarities[2]” or parameters already in place (ex. population segmentation by age)[3].

Is failure to “connect the dots” a US specific illness due to someone’s incompetence[4] or is it something much more nefarious? I let you decide.

I just submit the following series of events, facts, observations and thoughts, for discussion. While going over the series of events, please, recognize that at any point in time we DO NOT KNOW what will happen next week, month, – never mind years or decades later. Right now, we may speculate about the outcome of the November 2010 elections but we do not know their results. Just as now in August 2010 we do not know what will happen in October, November, December this year, or in 2011, 2012, 2013, – in 1960s nobody could predict what would happen in 1979, January 1993. Or could he?

Chapter 1

August 20-21, 1968, Prague, Czechoslovakia

Moscow, Tuesday August 20, 1968 about 4 PM Local Time [2 PM Prague, 8 AM New York City]

Czechoslovak Ambassador Pavlovský in Moscow allegedly receives a brief phone call. The caller says just one sentence, “It was decided for tonight” and hangs up. The Ambassador calls immediately the First Secretary of the Czechoslovak Communist Party Alexander Dubček in Prague with this information. Dubček gets a note about the call but does not share it with anyone[5].

Prague, Ruzyně Airport, August 20, 1968 – mid afternoon

An unscheduled flight with about 100 very athletic looking young men, allegedly some kind of sports team, arrives from Moscow. All men carry sizeable duffle bags and go straight out without being stopped by the customs officers. A couple of busses chartered by the Russian Embassy are waiting for them. They leave for an unknown destination.

Prague, Hradčany Castle, August 20, 1968 evening.

A meeting of key party and government officials is taking place at the Hradčany Castle, the Czech equivalent of the White House or Palais de l’Elysée. Dubček still does not say a word about the afternoon warning call to his colleagues. Allegedly, he does not believe it. At about 10 PM the Minister of Communications Hoffman excuses himself, goes out and orders his people to shut down all international phone communications.

Prague, Ruzyně Airport, August 20, 1968 about 10:40 PM Local Time [4:40 PM New York City]

The Russian athletic looking men, now in commando gear, appear back at the Ruzyně Airport. They quickly overpower the night crew and take control of the control tower. Few minutes later at about 11 PM local time the first Russian Air Force transport planes start landing in very short intervals one after another. They very quickly offload the troops and tanks and immediately take off and fly back.

At the same time, Russian units, with some relatively small numbers of Polish, East German, Hungarian and Bulgarian soldiers start crossing the borders all around the country.

The news of the crossings by the border guards reaches the meeting in Prague. Dubček bursts into tears, “They should not have done this to me. I trusted them,” he is said to have uttered, crying. For those who have not seen Dubcek in those days, just visualize the whining Jimmy Carter. The body language is eerily similar.

It is said the President Johnson[6] had advance information about the (preparation of the) invasion but he decided against giving a heads-up to the Czech leaders.

Prague, Downtown, Wednesday, August 21, 1968

Less than eight hours after the beginning of the military operation, the population wakes up to a sight of Russian tanks all over the streets of downtown Prague. One should be impressed by the logistics and the execution. Books were written about the events that followed.

Chapter 2

15 years later: January 1983, Glendale, Arizona

In 1979, a high ranking KGB officer, Stanislav Levchenko defected to the United States[7]

On December 17, 1982 a document titled “Unmasking Moscow’s “Institute of the U.S.A.” was published by the Heritage Foundation[8]. The Heritage Foundation document was based on July 7, 1981 declassified CIA’s debriefings of Stanislav Levchenko.

The original CIA debriefings document titled “Soviet Active Measures” came to my possession at Thunderbird School of Global Management in early January 1983. It was distributed by Werner Wagenlerner, then, allegedly, the West German Undersecretary of Defense, i.e. the highest West German Defense career official. He was our professor for a course titled “Selected Topics on Europe.”

As you can see in the document itself, since 1960s, that is in the years leading to the occupation of Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union had a very thorough and consistent strategy of manipulating Western media as well as potential future persons of influence. Let’s leave aside for now their specific use of fake information and disinformation of the West through the media. I let you read about that in the document.

As part of their strategy to manipulate the public opinion in the West in their favor, the Soviet Union founded in 1960 the Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow[9] . The role of this University was to attract young students from all over the world and to convert them to the Russian, socialist / communist way of thinking as well as develop friendly personal relationships.

For the sake of intellectual integrity, let’s acknowledge that the strategy of influencing future leaders in other countries is common elsewhere. Switzerland, for one, likes to have foreign students in their Universities too (I know, I studied with them), hoping that once they return to their countries of origin (mostly in the third world), they will favor trade with Swiss companies instead of French, German or British ones. That’s the Swiss / Western approach.

The Russian approach, as documented by Levchenko is significantly more devious. Since the early sixties they clearly, strategically and deliberately manipulated the psyche of as many youngsters from all over the world as they could. The goal was to inoculate the socialist way of thinking and friendly attitude to the Soviet long term strategy of world domination. Yes, world domination. That’s what we, as kids, were taught daily in the middle and high schools in the sixties in the Socialist Czechoslovakia: “The Communist regime is the best and will ultimately prevail worldwide.” There was no secret about that. It was the mantra. The goal of the future Russian / communist world domination was taught to us daily and openly[10].

They succeeded beyond their wildest dreams:

10 / 25 years later: Wednesday, January 20, 1993, Washington DC

At 12 Noon, William Jefferson Clinton, becomes the 42nd President of the United States. Anyone heard the term “Manchurian Candidate”? See the Chapter 4, below, for more. But wait, the story is not over yet.

Chapter 3

Three years later: Tuesday, October 1, 1996

On October 1, 1996 I arrived to Prague for a short visit to the old country. In a magazine coincidentally available on the newsstands that day, I found a large (two large pages) article by several Czech journalists (possibly Mlady Svet?) on Hillary Clinton’s stay that summer[11]. It was an outstanding piece of journalistic investigation, completely ignored in the West. (One might ask “Why?”). The authors documented that 1. She was not there in any official capacity or on invitation by the Czech government, and 2. She was not staying in any hotels but was staying in numerous private residences. They then listed, first and last names, the hosting families. All these hosts were identified as former, hard core communists from the sixties, now out of power. Anyone heard about this in the US?

One thing we have to give her, – she clearly did stay loyal to her old college friends. It has been extensively documented (and discussed BEFORE Bill Clinton became President) how both, Bill and Hillary as boyfriend and girlfriend frequently traveled between London where Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar and Moscow and Prague. Yet nobody in the Western Media seems to have connected the dots. Anyone wants to suggest an explanation?

Excerpt: ….Quote from Footnote [11]:

Clinton first used it in an address at the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty headquarters in Prague on July 4, 1996. The kicker then wasn’t a call to restore American greatness abroad, but to safeguard hard-won freedoms from the Soviet incursion. “Freedom has come, and now it is up to each of us to determine what freedom will mean,” she told the crowd in Prague. Unquote.

Thirteen years later: Thursday, January 21, 2009 to present

Hillary Rodham Clinton becomes the 67th United States Secretary of State – person in charge of the United States foreign affaires, and thus privy to all United States secrets. It is she who now negotiates with Vladimir Putin in the name of the United States. Is it reasonable to think someone in the Congress got “asleep at the wheel” during her confirmation hearings?

Chapter 4

Bill Clinton’s Russian connection[12]:

Quote

As a Georgetown junior, Clinton inherited his antiwar orientation from his part-time employer, Senator J. William Fulbright. Fulbright’s views on Vietnam had in turn been influenced by scholar Bernard Fall. Fall had an academic background at institutions linked to Chinese Communist apologist Owen Lattimore. He had recently co-authored a book on Vietnam with Marcus Raskin, cofounder of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), which disseminated Marxist propaganda aimed to sway Fulbright and other decision-makers. Fulbright’s office was also in regular contact with Igor Bubnov, a KGB operative on Capitol Hill. President Johnson had ordered the FBI to monitor Fulbright and his staff for suspected Communist contact at the time Clinton went to work for Fulbright.

Clinton remained relatively quiet about his war views during his first year as a grad student at Oxford from fall 1968 to spring 1969. He took an activist turn in summer 1969 while seeking to avoid being drafted. During summer vacation, he worked with the Vietnam Moratorium Committee (VMC), a US antiwar group which was helping a Communist-dominated coalition called the New Mobe to organize fall protests.

Upon Clinton’s return to Oxford that fall, he and his friend Richard Stearns helped a British VMC counterpart called Group 68 organize Americans in England for Moratorium protest events. (A supplementary background profile of Group 68 follows the body of the article, exploring the group’s links to a British antiwar network centered around Bertrand Russell and Russell’s associate Tariq Ali. Russell’s network helped the North Vietnamese and Soviets disseminate anti-US propaganda through channels such as the International War Crimes Tribunal, sponsored by the Soviet front the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam.)

Over winter vacation of 1969-1970, Clinton toured Moscow, where he had been preceded by his roommate Strobe Talbott. Talbott was then translating the memoirs of former Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, which had been leaked to him by Victor Louis, a KGB disinformation agent and talent spotter. Clinton and Talbott’s other roommate Frank Aller was doing similar work on the unpublished notes of Edgar Snow, an academic associate of Lattimore.

The conclusion suggests possible directions for further research, considering where additional information on Clinton’s early activity might be found in government files and other sources.

Unquote

And again in the same document:

Quote

Meanwhile the KGB tried to influence Fulbright’s staff directly. In 1967, Soviet ambassador Igor Bubnov, an active KGB operative on Capitol Hill, initiated regular discussions with Fulbright’s chief of staff Carl Marcy. (After retiring from government service in 1973, Marcy would work for several organizations associated with Communist or IPS activity, including the Council for a Liveable World, the Center for International Policy, and the American Committee on United States-Soviet Relations aka American Committee on East-West Accord.)

US intelligence came to suspect Communist influence on Fulbright. In February 1966, President Johnson ordered FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to investigate whether Fulbright and other Senate critics of US policy in Vietnam were receiving information from Communists. Hoover produced a report which demonstrated a correlation between the Soviet party line and the public statements of Fulbright and Senator Wayne Morse, but without authorization for wiretaps he was unable to confirm any direct contact with Communists or foreign agents. Ordered to seek confirmation, Hoover spent the next weeks producing a 67-page review of FBI wiretap records of contacts between Soviet bloc embassies and US Senators, Representatives, and Congressional staff, covering the period from July 1965 to March 1966. Hoover continued submitting biweekly follow-up reports to Johnson through January 1968. Johnson tasked other intelligence agencies to conduct similar inquiries. In 1968 Johnson boasted that he knew within minutes what Fulbright was saying over lunch at the Soviet embassy. Secretary of State Dean Rusk conveyed this fact to Marcy, telling him, “We know every time that you or people on your staff meet with people in the Soviet bloc.”

While US intelligence was investigating Fulbright and his staff, Georgetown junior Bill Clinton joined Fulbright’s staff in summer 1966. Clinton had looked to Fulbright as a role model since high school, when he first learned that Fulbright had attended England’s Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar, a career path Clinton would follow as a graduate student. He got the job with Fulbright through Jack Holt, a local politician who was supported by Clinton’s uncle Raymond. After Uncle Raymond got him on Holt’s campaign, Clinton approached Holt and expressed his interest in working for Fulbright. Holt recommended him to Fulbright’s administrative assistant Lee Williams. Williams offered Clinton a job as an assistant clerk on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

Clinton continued working for Fulbright into his senior year. According to his autobiography My Life, he worked in the document room of the committee’s offices on the fourth floor of what was then called the New Senate Office Building (later renamed the Dirksen Senate Office Building), while Carl Marcy and a few committee senior staff worked in a larger room at the Capitol Building. Clinton’s primary duty was “taking memos and other materials back and forth between the Capitol and Senator Fulbright’s office, including confidential material for which I would have to receive proper government clearance. Beyond that, I would do whatever was required, from reading newspapers and clipping important articles for the staff and interested senators to answering requests for speeches and other materials, to adding names to the committee’s mailing list.” He often read “material stamped ‘confidential’ and ‘secret’ that I had to deliver from time to time”.

According to Clinton, he adopted an antiwar position while working under Fulbright. A few months after he began working for Fulbright, he had the Senator autograph a copy of his book The Arrogance of Power, which criticized US foreign policy on Vietnam and other topics. Clinton says his antiwar orientation was also influenced by members of Fulbright’s staff who encouraged him to study the issue of draft deferment.

Unquote

And Bill Clinton in Prague, from the same publication.

Quote

The delegation Clinton met sounds like it may have been related to the activities of the Committee of Liaison with Families of Servicemen Detained in North Vietnam (COLIFAM), an antiwar group formed in summer 1969 which negotiated POW exchanges in return for pro-Communist propaganda statements. However this is only informed speculation that has not been verified.

Clinton stayed in Moscow about five days. Several accounts say he left via the Soviet airline Aeroflot, but Clinton says “Nikki and her Haitian friend Helene put me on the train”.

In either case, Clinton’s next stop was Prague, Czechoslovakia, where he arrived on January 6, 1970. There he looked up the family of his Oxford friend Jan Kopold. Kopold’s family was well-connected in Czech Communist circles. Clinton received a guided tour of Prague from Marie Svermova, the widow of Czech Communist Party hero Jan Sverma, who was Jan Kopold’s grandfather. In 1969 the Kopolds ostensibly held dissident political views against the ruling regime, which had grown unpopular among reformers and student activists after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia the previous year.

Clinton stayed in Czechoslovakia through January 12. According to his account, he then went on to Munich, West Germany to visit his friend Rudy Lowe and celebrate Faschingsfest, a Carnival Season festival with costumes similar to Mardis Gras or Halloween.

Unquote

Then there is the Bill Clinton Czech Communist Connection from article by Joel A. Ruth from April 30, 1999[13].

Quote

Activities such as Clinton’s were not at all out of character for Oxford students during that period and it has been estimated that even today, upwards of 60 percent of all British professors hold moderate to extreme Socialist views. For such, the Universities had long been the home recruiting ground of the international communist movement. Its successes were exemplified by their recruitment of the traitors Kim Philby and Donald MacLean.

While Bill Clinton has never explained who paid for his trip to Moscow, he was accompanied by a friend and fellow Oxford student, Czech Jan Kopold. They were to attend a meeting of the War Moratorium Committee to be held January 2, 1970. Upon arrival, Clinton did not check into a youth hostel, but rather stayed at the Hotel National, the most exclusive and expensive one in Moscow of that time — a ritzy place usually reserved for foreign ambassadors and high-level Communist Party apparatchiks.

In today’s terms, that trip would probably cost several thousand dollars. Clinton only had his tiny $275 Rhodes stipend to live on and never held a job. Thus, it is easy to believe that this tab and the arrangements could only have handled by the KGB, which during that epoch limited no expenses in its attempts to recruit promising American students in Europe.

Clinton has also never accounted for the 11 days spent in Moscow before the actual meeting of the War Moratorium and has never revealed who paid his expenses or what he did or whom he met with during that time. However, for a tourist visiting Red Square in Moscow, a trip to Lenin’s Tomb is usually on the itinerary. For a visiting leftist, such a visit is as requisite as a Moslem’s visit to the Kabah while in Mecca. Standing before the mummy of the High Priest of Communism and Atheism on Christmas Day, for a communist, had long represented a symbolic, ritual act of contempt and abnegation of all the religious, spiritual, and ethical values which most Americans cherish.

Even more telling was Clinton’s January 4 return trip from Moscow on another Aeroflot jet. The flight terminated in Prague, then the capital of the Czechoslovakian Soviet Socialist Republic (CSSR)[14]. There, Clinton was a guest of Jan Kopold’s father, Bedrich Kopold and Jan’s maternal grandmother Maria Svermova, who was the original founder of the Czech Communist Party in the 1930s. During his visit, she took a liking to young Bill; they walked and talked. Svermova’s deceased husband was the original editor of Rude Pravo, the Czech Communist Party paper before the War.

After the Soviet-backed Communist coup of Czechoslovakia in February 1948 had disposed of Democratic President Jan Masaryk by tossing him out a window of the Foreign Ministry, Rudolf Saltzman, a.k.a. Slansky, became the new president. Karel Svab, Maria’s brother, was appointed Commissar of Secret Police and was responsible for the subsequent murders, tortures, and deportations to Russian gulags of several hundred thousand Christians, democracy advocates, anti-Communists, and even religious Jews who had survived the Holocaust. Under the Saltzman/Slansky regime (1949-1952), Maria Svermova was Secretary of the Communist Party and the Central Committee, the supreme ruling body. While the majority of Jews in pre-war Czechoslovakia were anti-Communist, the Party itself was dominated by a clique of apostate Jews who had long since abandoned the principles of their religion to embrace the False God of Marxism.

The entire Kopold clan was a significant part of the ruling Communist party elite and was responsible for those murders and deportations either by the act or as formulators of policy. In fact, 11 out of 12 Politburo leaders of the Czech Communist Party were apostate Jews who had taken refuge in Moscow just prior to the German occupation of the Czech rump state in 1939. It was easy for the Communists to seize control in 1948 without popular resistance because the Germans had confiscated all private weapons during the War.

In 1948, Saltzman/Slansky smuggled guns and explosives to Palestine to arm the Zionist organizations, the Haganah, the Stern Gang, and the Irgun to enable them to keep killing British officials until Britain became fed up and pulled out. In 1949 these gangs organized the ethnic cleansing of over one million Palestinian Arabs from their lands which were then confiscated and made an integral part of the nascent State of Israel. President Saltzman/Slansky in turn paid with his life for assisting the Zionists. Accused of harboring Jewish nationalist sentiments, which were in opposition to Marxist internationalism, Stalin sent him to the gallows in 1952.

Years later, when Clinton was President, he again flew to Moscow, this time on Air Force One, to meet Boris Yeltsin. Then, on his return flight he had the plane stop in Prague, where, besides playing the saxophone — important stuff — he went to visit the parents of his Oxford friend Jan Kopold. By then, Maria Svermova had died of old age. As for Jan Kopold, he had been killed earlier in an “accidental fall” in Turkey in 1970, becoming perhaps the first of a long string of former Clinton friends and associates to meet an untimely end. Interestingly, Clinton told the news media people accompanying him on the Prague pit stop that the Kopolds were “old friends he had long admired.” Nothing appeared in the press, however, about Clinton’s admiration for and association with this family once such an intimate part of the ruling echelon of the murderous criminal Soviet puppet government that had enslaved Czechoslovakia.

Unquote

In conclusion, some open questions:

Jan Masaryk ( + March 10, 1948, Foreign Ministry Building, Prague)[15] —— Vince Foster (+ July 20, 1993, Marcy Park, Washington, DC)[16] ——  ?

Do you still remember the series of suspicious deaths of personalities (besides Vince Foster) during the Clinton years?

The deaths of the two personalities, Jan Masaryk and Vince Foster, happened some forty five years apart and on different sides of the Atlantic Ocean, – yet the Modus Operandi (of questionable suicides) looks so strangely similar! Should we / are we allowed to be asking questions? If not, what does it say about us?

In your opinion, how would Rahm Emmanuel’s famous sentence (“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” Rahm Emanuel, Mr. Obama’s new chief of staff, told a Wall Street Journal conference of top corporate chief executives this week”) reported by The Wall Street Journal online on November 21, 2008[17] fit in the process?

Do you see it fitting in 1929-1932 Germany?

It is early August 2010. What’s next? Is there anybody else who sees eerie similarities with other historical events? Anyone would venture into forecasting or at least asking “Why?”


[1] The term “Active Measures” is used for undercover / intelligence activities with the goal of manipulating public opinion in a wide variety of ways.

[2] See also Leonard Peikoff’s Ominous Parallels, © 1982, Meridian – Penguin Books 1983 (Library of Congress Catalog Number 83-60247) for his take on some other scary historical parallels.   http://www.amazon.com/Ominous-Parallels-Brilliant-parallels-pre-Hitler/dp/0452011175/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1280432538&sr=1-3

[3] A 1977 book by Helène Carrère d’Encausse titled L’Empire Eclaté predicted the fall of the Russian Empire. The prediction was based on the birthrates of the Russian Christian vs. Muslim populations and upcoming conflict within the Red Army – officers mainly Christian, soldiers mainly Islamic. In spite of this publication, the CIA was “surprised” by the 1989 fall of Berlin wall. I guess they don’t read French.

[4] The FBI failure (“failure”?) to “connect-the-dots” before the 9-11 is still in everybody’s fresh memory.

[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_Pact_invasion_of_Czechoslovakia now says it was the Czechoslovak Ambassador to Hungary, Jozef Pučik who allegedly received the warning call. In the days after the invasion, this author was told / the word on the street was, that it was the Ambassador Pavlovský in Moscow who received that warning phone call.

[6] To get a better perspective on the various events, here is the timeline of the American Presidents during the events described in this article:

Lyndon Johnson                     November 22, 1963 – January 20, 1969

Richard Nixon                         January 20, 1969 – August 9, 1974

Gerald Ford                              August 9, 1974 – January 20, 1977

Jimmy Carter                          January 20, 1977 – January 20, 1981

Ronald Reagan                       January 20, 1981 – January 20, 1989

George H.W. Bush                 January 20, 1989 – January 20, 1993

William J. Clinton                 January 20, 1993 – January 20, 2001

George W. Bush                     January 20, 2001 – January 20, 2009

[7] See, for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Levchenko and references cited there.

[8] http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/1982/12/Unmasking-Moscows-Institute-of-the-USA

[9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peoples%27_Friendship_University_of_Russia

[10] The logic was: The Communist regime is the best. Those who disagreed must then be mentally ill. Hence unlimited incarceration of opponents (without any judicial proceedings) – mainly in the former Soviet Union. Also well documented.

[11] From the Time magazine of July 12, 2007 http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1643100,00.html

[12] http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1884984/posts

[13] http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16122

[14] Correction: CSSR stood for Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, not for Czechoslovak Soviet Socialist Republic as said in the article above.

[15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Masaryk (as review with other primary references)

[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Foster (as review with other primary references)

[17] http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB122721278056345271.html

Poll: Czechs happy with their currency, banks

June 03, 2010 By: admin Category: Economy, International

Most Czechs believe that keeping the Czech crown is better for the country than adopting the euro, according to a survey by the Ipsos Tambor polling agency released on Thursday. Some 88 percent of those polled said that having the koruna is an advantage, which represents an increase of 25 percentage points since the previous poll in November 2008; only four percent believe the crown can bring the country economic problems. Some 88 percent of Czechs who took part in the poll also trust banks, an increase of 6 percentage points.

http://www.radio.cz/en/news   June 3, 2010


After you visited this site, please do not forget to "Share" our Vial Lido Facebook page (The “Share” function is on http://www.facebook.com/pages/Via-Lido/113135125384472, in the pull down menu under the Settings button, - (the flower / dented wheel sign placed just next to the “Like” button. You will have to "Log In" yourself first). Thanks!